Europe receives the most credit for the industrial revolution, yet as in most cases, Europe is not the only place undergoing a great transformation. Many Asian countries were the original pioneers of many industries. For example, India headed textile production. China had been on the verge of industrial revolution long before, but the Asian countries successes had subsided by the time Europe reached revolution. It is interesting that, again, Europe is remembered for accomplishing something that they are not the first to accomplish.
However, Britain did end up with the breakthrough revolution for a reason. Britain had the largest interest and amount of resources for business out of all the competing countries. Britain ended up with substantial business related possessions in multiple other countries. Their inventions, such as crop rotation, smaller plows and selective breeding were used heavily by the eighteenth century, highly replacing farmers. Britain had the means to start an industrial revolution more than the others.
The Industrial Revolution changed British society. The success of the aristocracy declined as industrial success arose. Those who owned land were no longer the most wealthy. However, aristocrats still managed to maintain their wealth despite this. It is intriguing to see the power shift, even if not by much.
The mind set of the British middle class began to change during this time. The middle class, who mostly held industrial jobs, began to see poverty as a mindset. They revolted until middle class men were granted the right to vote. Self help became popular, with the hopes of making middle class wise. It was during this time that the middle class began to be granted rights.
Karl Marx noted in his writings that he was against the industrial revolution. It created laws that Marxist tried so hard to protest. Marx discovered scientific socialism and figured that the industrial revolution provided the wealth to make that possible. He had made great discoveries in social development and found these ties to the revolution. He had decided that socialism and revolution were going to happen inevitably. His predictions were correct, as many read his writings. He had been compared to Newton with his discovery of the laws of motion. Karl Marx had clear opinions on the industrial revolution and was a great influence in that time.
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Wednesday, February 15, 2017
Chapter 16 Part 1 blog post
An interesting point about chapter 16 was the enlightenment inspired ideas that sparked the Atlantic revolutions of the United States, France and Haiti. The Enlightenment spoke against a monarch way of thinking and towards equality. The Enlightenment brought about thoughts of democracy and liberty. This inspired those of the three mentioned countries to break away from the previous way of life and toward their idea of democracy. However, what is most interesting is what that new idea of liberty was. Equality was reserved for Caucasian males with money. The rest were treated as lesser than, but this still seemed a reasonable definition of democracy. This new way of living was regarded as freedon, but today, it would not seem so. It is interesting to see how far we have come.
While the Revolutionary War was, in fact, revolurionary, it was not as much of a quest for independence as I had been taught. They did become independent in many ways. They governed themselves. They developed a Declaration of Independence and Constitution which outlined their rights. However, not everything changed. They maintained the idea that white men in power receive the majority of rights even in their independence. The colonists for a long time had not even thought of rebelling for a long time due to advantages of living under British rule. Therefore, the American Revolution is less revolutionary than originally taught.
The French Revolution in itself was highly interesting. The United States' dictator lived far away, but France was dealing with issues in their own immediate country. The nobility and clergy lived lavish lives while "the rest" was treated far less fairly. The issue with this was that the nobility created one per cent of the nation, while the clergy made up another one per cent. This means that ninety eight per cent of the nation included the poorly treated rest. This effected the rest directly, daily.
A question posed in class asked what the ninety eight percent rest of the United States today would he. Likely, this would include anyone who is not an upperclass citizen. Washington and members of corporate businesses such as Google would make up the first two per cent. They make the most money and it is very difficult to get through to any of them in asking for equality. Middle class and below are obviously not cared about and as of now, this remains unchanging. Our situation is not entirely far off that that the French experienced.
An interesting point about chapter 16 was the enlightenment inspired ideas that sparked the Atlantic revolutions of the United States, France and Haiti. The Enlightenment spoke against a monarch way of thinking and towards equality. The Enlightenment brought about thoughts of democracy and liberty. This inspired those of the three mentioned countries to break away from the previous way of life and toward their idea of democracy. However, what is most interesting is what that new idea of liberty was. Equality was reserved for Caucasian males with money. The rest were treated as lesser than, but this still seemed a reasonable definition of democracy. This new way of living was regarded as freedon, but today, it would not seem so. It is interesting to see how far we have come.
While the Revolutionary War was, in fact, revolurionary, it was not as much of a quest for independence as I had been taught. They did become independent in many ways. They governed themselves. They developed a Declaration of Independence and Constitution which outlined their rights. However, not everything changed. They maintained the idea that white men in power receive the majority of rights even in their independence. The colonists for a long time had not even thought of rebelling for a long time due to advantages of living under British rule. Therefore, the American Revolution is less revolutionary than originally taught.
The French Revolution in itself was highly interesting. The United States' dictator lived far away, but France was dealing with issues in their own immediate country. The nobility and clergy lived lavish lives while "the rest" was treated far less fairly. The issue with this was that the nobility created one per cent of the nation, while the clergy made up another one per cent. This means that ninety eight per cent of the nation included the poorly treated rest. This effected the rest directly, daily.
A question posed in class asked what the ninety eight percent rest of the United States today would he. Likely, this would include anyone who is not an upperclass citizen. Washington and members of corporate businesses such as Google would make up the first two per cent. They make the most money and it is very difficult to get through to any of them in asking for equality. Middle class and below are obviously not cared about and as of now, this remains unchanging. Our situation is not entirely far off that that the French experienced.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)